SPELL-BOUND
English is known for exceptions to
rules and inconsistencies between spelling and speech. The question often arises: why not change the
spelling system and spell words how they sound?
While it may seem that such a move would simplify matters, consider the
complications.
(1) In a hope to spell words how they sound, we
could ask, "How do the symbols themselves sound?" The Latin alphabet was borrowed to write
English. Latin's five vowel symbols do
well for writing Latin's five vowel sounds, but when we use those five symbols
to write the ten vowel sounds of English, the result is far from a perfect
match. Some dialects of English have
more than ten vowel sounds, but for the sake of simplicity we will deal with
ten. Below, we list some of the spellings
used for each vowel sound; then in parentheses we list the vowels having that
sound, and the total number of spellings for that sound (the vowel symbols are
standard linguistic orthography; e.g., Campbell
1999, xix; Beekes 1995, 270):
i: seat, receipt,
reed, read, feet, feat, machine, sink, grieve, wavy (e, i,
y; 7 spellings)
I: sit, rid, fit, busy,
women, we’re, here, superior, myth, sheer, hear,
weird, discipline, village
(a,
e, i, o, u, y, that is, all five vowels plus y; 10 spellings)
e: sate, raid,
fate, gourmet, chalet, feign, eight, great, say, day, guage,
lingerie (a, e; 8 spellings)
ε: set, red, fed,
bear, bare, bury, marry, many, said, leather, (h)air, their
(a, e, u; 6 spellings)
æ: sat, rat, fat,
laugh, lather, cow, flower (a, o; 3 spellings)
a: father, bother,
sought, rot, ensemble, sergeant, caught,
cough, bought, buy, heart, car, lingerie,
gone (a, e, i, o, u, all five
vowels; 9 spellings)
ə: some, come,
rut, fun, won, one, the, bulletin, compliment, women,
woman, rough, flood, love,
brother, photography
(a, e, i, o, u; 8 spellings)
o: go, comb, or,
ore, road, so, sew, though, flow, war, wore, worn,
warn, sword, door
(a,
e, o; 8 spellings)
U: soot, book, foot,
put, full, woman, would (o, u; 4 spellings)
u: suit, boot,
rude, do, move, two, to, too, womb, through, shoe,
blew, blue (e, o, u; 10)
Not counting dipthongs or vowel
combinations, the vowel a represents seven different sounds of the ten
English vowel sounds; e does eight of the ten; i is good for
four; o yields seven of the ten; and u does five.
A final silent e is supposed
to make the preceding vowel long, but it often does not: discipline, vineyard,
machine, gone, one, come, love, purpose.
The glides w and y are
semi-vowels, because they are similar to the vowels u and i, but
so is English r and the so-called -er sound nearly a vowel sound,
having little to do with e. Any
of the five vowel symbols before r can yield the er sound: solar,
coward, sugar, her, fir, sir, favor, work, rigor, sure, fur, urgent. Let r be the vocalic r
symbol. In Ute and Hopi, the vowel ö
sounds like English r, such that iron
would be spelled ayön.
Note that ough has six
distinct sounds: a (thought), əf (tough), af (cough), o (though),
u (through), æu
(bough); and ou also has six: æu (house, sour, wound), o (pour), u
(soup, wound),
U (could), ə
(jealous), r (journey). The
sequence ea has seven sounds: i (beach, eat), I (hear, beard), e (great,
steak), ε (head, bear), a (heart), ə (sergeant), r (earth). Double oo has four sounds: o (door), u
(boot), U (book), ə (blood).
Considerable variety exists for
consonants as well. Our so-called sh-sound
is represented by seven spellings: sh (shingle); ss (pressure, permission); ti
(nation); s (sure, tension, question); sch (schwa); ch (chef, chivalry,
machine); and ci (musician). The k-sound
has five: k (kite); ck (back); c (cat); ch (choir, mechanic); q (quiet). Foot, phone, and rough denote three
spellings for the f-sound.
Gentle, just, and edge show three for the j-sound; and azure,
measure, sabotage, and equation show four for the zh-sound. Three pronunciations belong to the -tion ending: nation (sh), question
(ch), and equation (zh). Then we tell
school children: “Just sound it out!”
(2) If we spell words like they sound, then
many homonyms, now distinguished in written English, would be spelled the
same. Which spelling should we select
for homonyms like once and wants; or one and won;
or to, too, and two; or do, due, and dew; or doe
and dough; or for, fore, and four? We also have homonyms like worn and warn;
and wore and war; but adding y to the last gives us wary,
whose vowel is like wear; then add y to wear, and we have weary,
whose vowel is like weird and we're, though were and worm
exhibit the more usual r-sound of any vowel-plus-r.
(3) Shall we spell foreign words how they
sound—shevrolay—and obscure their origin?
And how far back is foreign?
Would we consider the Scandinavian loans they, their, and them
foreign? Would the Latin loans into
continental Germanic count as foreign: mile, dish, cup, line, street? Nearly 90% of the "English"
vocabulary in an unabridged dictionary is from foreign sources.
(4) English pronunciation changes vowel
qualities as the accent moves back and forth in related words. Should we replace photograph and photography
with fotəgræf and fətagrəfy?
Or should we obscure that relationship and those of other related words
like south and southern to sæuθ and səðrn?
(5) The spell-binding power of visual
perceptions or written orthography sometimes prevents us from hearing what we
are saying: for example, not all English speakers realize that the th-sound
is actually two sounds: one is voiced ð, as in this, and the other is
voiceless θ, as in think, as different as z and s, or v
and f. Consider the following
abundance of th-sounds: Heather and Dorothy close their thick math books
because their mother thinks they should bathe their brother Timothy, though the
weather lacks warmth. Reversing the
voicing of the two th-sounds yields: Heaθer and Doroðy close θeir ðick
mað books because θeir moθer ðinks θey should baθe θeir broθer Timoðy, θough θe
weaθer lacks warmð.
(6) While our spelling system may seem
archaic and outdated, the archaic spellings do give us insight into how the
words were originally pronounced. When
English first became a written language, words were spelled how they
sounded. Thus, silent letters used to be
pronounced: the l’s of walk and talk, as well as knife's
slient k and e. The
previous reality of the silent gh in daughter is apparent in
German tochter, Greek thugater, and Sanskrit duhitar. Compare know
with its Greek cognate gnostic (knowing). Changing the spelling would remove the
historical hints of language ties and original pronunciations.
(7) A change in our spelling system now would
later become outdated after another century or two of inevitable language
change, and the words would again not be spelled as they sound. Would we then change the spelling system
again and perhaps make this a bi-centennial event?
Perhaps the alphabet does have us
spell-bound or bound to the present spelling system, but ‘fixing’ it may create
as many problems as it solves, if not more, and would certainly erase a lot of
history.
No comments:
Post a Comment